R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 22) [2016] NSWSC 80

R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 22) [2016] NSWSC 80

In light of the evidence given and the absence of opposition by either accused, it was appropriate that the view include the additional area at the corner of Arab Road and Stuart Street, Padstow.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Evidence / Procedural Ruling on Crown Notice of Motion Seeking Extension of View Orders
Outcome
Orders granted
Legal Topics
['view' 'extension of Orders' 'evidence Act 1995 (nsw) S. 53']
['criminal Law' 'evidence'] ['view' 'extension of Orders' 'evidence Act 1995 (nsw) S. 53']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Law Evidence / Procedural Ruling on Crown Notice of Motion Seeking Extension of View Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the previous order for a view should be extended to include the area at the corner of Arab Road and Stuart Street at Padstow.']

Ratio Decidendi

In light of the evidence given and the absence of opposition by either accused, it was appropriate that the view include the additional area at the corner of Arab Road and Stuart Street, Padstow.

Court Disposition

Orders granted

Orders

  • ['The view to be undertaken on Thursday 18 February 2016 include, in addition to those areas nominated in the previous judgment, the area nominated as the corner of Arab Road and Stuart Street, Padstow.']