R v Smith; R v Catt [2023] NSWDC 166

R v Smith; R v Catt [2023] NSWDC 166

Having regard to the objective seriousness of the offences, the aggravating factors including prior violent offences (Smith), the circumstances of the offending, the effects on the victims, mitigating factors such as guilty pleas and expressions of remorse, and special circumstances (mental health, substance abuse, prospects of rehabilitation), aggregate terms of imprisonment are imposed. Only imprisonment is appropriate. Non-parole periods are determined in consideration of the offenders’ needs for rehabilitation and community protection.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Both offenders convicted and sentenced to aggregate terms of imprisonment with non-parole periods; special circumstances found for both; eligibility for parole noted.
Legal Topics
['violent Offences' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'stalking or Intimidation' 'break and Enter' 'property Offences' 'sentencing']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 ['Appropriate sentences for aggravated break and enter and assault occasioning actual bodily harm' 'Appropriate sentences for use/possession of an offensive weapon with intent to intimidate' 'Sentencing considerations for offenders with mental health and substance abuse issues' 'Application of standard non-parole periods and aggregation of sentences']

Ratio Decidendi

Having regard to the objective seriousness of the offences, the aggravating factors including prior violent offences (Smith), the circumstances of the offending, the effects on the victims, mitigating factors such as guilty pleas and expressions of remorse, and special circumstances (mental health, substance abuse, prospects of rehabilitation), aggregate terms of imprisonment are imposed. Only imprisonment is appropriate. Non-parole periods are determined in consideration of the offenders’ needs for rehabilitation and community protection.

Court Disposition

Both offenders convicted and sentenced to aggregate terms of imprisonment with non-parole periods; special circumstances found for both; eligibility for parole noted.

Orders

  • ['Frank Alexander Smith is convicted.' 'Aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years and 9 months with non-parole period of 3 years and 6 months, commencing 4 April 2022.' 'Non-parole period expires 3 October 2025; head sentence expires 3 January 2028.' 'Eligible for parole 3 October 2025.' 'Tenielle Catt is...