R v Ghoulmieh [2022] NSWDC 470
Taking into account the severity and nature of the offences, the offender's personal circumstances including youth, Aboriginal background, drug addiction, mental illness, and special circumstances, alongside the need for general and specific deterrence, a term of full-time custody is mandated. However, the circumstances justify a finding of special circumstances and an aggregate sentence reflecting both aggravating and mitigating factors.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions); Offender: Kane Ghoulmieh
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted; aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed
- Legal Topics
- Violent Offences, Detain for Advantage, Demanding Property With Menaces, Reckless Wounding, Armed Robbery, Sentencing, Aggravating Factors, Mitigating Factors, Breach of Conditional Liberty, Co Offender, Deterrence, Form 1 Offences, Moral Culpability, Aggregate Sentences, Aboriginal Offenders, Drug Addiction, Intoxication, Mental Illness, Special Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions)
Prosecution
Kane Ghoulmieh
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of appropriate sentence for multiple serious violent offences including detain for advantage, demanding property with menaces, reckless wounding, and armed robbery
- 2 Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors, including mental illness, drug addiction, Aboriginal background, and special circumstances
- 3 Assessment of objective seriousness of each offence
Ratio Decidendi
Taking into account the severity and nature of the offences, the offender's personal circumstances including youth, Aboriginal background, drug addiction, mental illness, and special circumstances, alongside the need for general and specific deterrence, a term of full-time custody is mandated. However, the circumstances justify a finding of special circumstances and an aggregate sentence reflecting both aggravating and mitigating factors.
Court Disposition
Convicted; aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed
Orders
- Convicted of each offence
- Taking into account a 25% discount for the pleas of guilty, the indicative sentences are: Sequence 1—4 years; Sequence 3—4 years, 6 months; Sequence 8—2 years, 6 months (indicative non-parole period 18 months); H80659148 Sequence 1—3 years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment