R v Reynolds [2024] NSWDC 425
Taking into account the seriousness of domestic violence offences, reduced moral culpability due to psychological factors, mitigation for remorse and rehabilitation, the aggregate sentence imposed is justified with a reduced weight on general deterrence and increased supervision and treatment on parole.
- Parties
- Crown: Rex; Offender: Wade Reynolds
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and aggregate custodial sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Violent Offences, Choking, Suffocation or Strangulation, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Sexual Offences, Armed Robbery, Domestic Violence, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Crown
Wade Reynolds
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of sentence for multiple violent offences including choking, assault with bodily harm, use of offensive weapon, and sexual touching without consent
- 2 Consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors in sentencing
- 3 Assessment of psychological and factual circumstances to determine moral culpability and risk of reoffending
Ratio Decidendi
Taking into account the seriousness of domestic violence offences, reduced moral culpability due to psychological factors, mitigation for remorse and rehabilitation, the aggregate sentence imposed is justified with a reduced weight on general deterrence and increased supervision and treatment on parole.
Court Disposition
Conviction and aggregate custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- Wade Reynolds is convicted.
- Aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months, dated from 6 November 2022.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment