R v Warwick (No.45) [2018] NSWSC 1352
Mr Sheather's voir dire evidence was relevant to the issues in the trial, the Accused identified no specific objection to any question or answer, no prejudice, and no provision of the Evidence Act 1995 requiring rejection, and in a judge alone trial admission would be efficient while preserving the Accused's ability to cross-examine; therefore the evidence should be admitted in the trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Crown Application to Admit Evidence Taken on Voir Dire as Evidence in the Trial
- Outcome
- Crown application granted; objection by the Accused not upheld.
- Legal Topics
- ['voir Dire Evidence' 'expert Opinion Evidence' 'admissibility' 'judge Alone Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Crown Application to Admit Evidence Taken on Voir Dire as Evidence in the Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether oral evidence of Mr Sheather taken on the voir dire between transcript pages 1607.6 and 1625.22 should be admitted as evidence in the trial.']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Sheather's voir dire evidence was relevant to the issues in the trial, the Accused identified no specific objection to any question or answer, no prejudice, and no provision of the Evidence Act 1995 requiring rejection, and in a judge alone trial admission would be efficient while preserving the Accused's ability to cross-examine; therefore the evidence should be admitted in the trial.
Court Disposition
Crown application granted; objection by the Accused not upheld.
Orders
- ['Order that the evidence of Mr Sheather between pages 1607.6 and 1625.22 which was taken on the voir dire be admitted as evidence in the trial.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment