Re Priceright Construction Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 324
Because the deed of company arrangement proposal was realistic, well advanced and likely to give unsecured creditors a substantially better return than winding up, further time was warranted; s.447A was broad enough to make Part 5.3A operate in relation to the company as if the s.439B(2) 60 day limit were extended and as if adjournment to 31 May 2006 were permitted despite regulation 5.6.18(2).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application Under S.447 a of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Concerning Voluntary Administration / Ex Parte Application for Orders Permitting Further Adjournment of the Second Meeting of Creditors
- Outcome
- Order under s.447A made; order reserving leave to interested persons to apply to vary the substantive order on 24 hours' notice also made.
- Legal Topics
- ['voluntary Administration' 'second Meeting of Creditors' "adjournment of Creditors' Meeting" 'extension of Statutory Deadline' 'deed of Company Arrangement Proposal' 'corporations Act 2001 (cth) S.447 A']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application Under S.447 a of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Concerning Voluntary Administration / Ex Parte Application for Orders Permitting Further Adjournment of the Second Meeting of Creditors
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an order under s.447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) may be made so that the second meeting of creditors convened under s.439A can be adjourned beyond the 60 day limit in s.439B(2).' 'Whether such an order may also address the identical 60 day limit imposed by regulation 5.6.18(2) of the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the circumstances justified further time for the administrators to pursue a deed of company arrangement proposal.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the deed of company arrangement proposal was realistic, well advanced and likely to give unsecured creditors a substantially better return than winding up, further time was warranted; s.447A was broad enough to make Part 5.3A operate in relation to the company as if the s.439B(2) 60 day limit were extended and as if adjournment to 31 May 2006 were permitted despite regulation 5.6.18(2).
Court Disposition
Order under s.447A made; order reserving leave to interested persons to apply to vary the substantive order on 24 hours' notice also made.
Orders
- ["Order pursuant to section 447A of the Corporations Act that Part 5.3A of that Act is to operate in relation to Priceright Construction Pty Limited as if section 439B(2) omitted all words after 'a day that is' and included instead of the omitted words the words 'later than 31 May 2006' and as if that Part allowed...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment