In the matter of Shield Mercantile Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1545
Leave under s 444GA was granted because the evidence showed the Company was plainly insolvent, had a deficiency of assets, and shareholders would receive no recovery in a liquidation; Mr Shields led no evidence establishing that the asserted repatriation claims had the value he attributed to them or that an indefinite stay of a winding up was a viable alternative. The s 447A order was made because the DOCA contained a plain error omitting WBC, WBC required correction before consenting, interested persons did not oppose the correction, and the correction would allow the DOCA to proceed for the benefit of creditors and employees.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application in the Equity Corporations List Under Ss 444 GA and 447 a of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Principal Judgment on Originating Process Filed on 30 July 2020
- Outcome
- Leave granted pursuant to s 444GA of the Corporations Act to transfer the Company shares. Order made pursuant to s 447A of the Corporations Act correcting an error in the DOCA. Plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings to be costs in the deed administration.
- Legal Topics
- ['voluntary Administration' 'deed of Company Arrangement' 'transfer of Shares Under S 444 Ga' 'unfair Prejudice to Shareholders' 'variation of DOCA Under S 447 A' 'stay of Winding Up']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application in the Equity Corporations List Under Ss 444 GA and 447 a of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Principal Judgment on Originating Process Filed on 30 July 2020
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted under s 444GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to transfer all issued shares in the Company in accordance with the DOCA.' 'Whether the proposed transfer would unfairly prejudice members of the Company.' "Whether asserted repatriation claims against banks gave the Company's shares residual equity value in a liquidation." 'Whether an indefinite stay of winding up was an available or appropriate alternative.' 'Whether an order should be made under s 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to correct a plain error in the DOCA by inserting a reference to WBC.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave under s 444GA was granted because the evidence showed the Company was plainly insolvent, had a deficiency of assets, and shareholders would receive no recovery in a liquidation; Mr Shields led no evidence establishing that the asserted repatriation claims had the value he attributed to them or that an indefinite stay of a winding up was a viable alternative. The s 447A order was made because the DOCA contained a plain error omitting WBC, WBC required correction before consenting, interested persons did not oppose the correction, and the correction would allow the DOCA to proceed for the benefit of creditors and employees.
Court Disposition
Leave granted pursuant to s 444GA of the Corporations Act to transfer the Company shares. Order made pursuant to s 447A of the Corporations Act correcting an error in the DOCA. Plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings to be costs in the deed administration.
Orders
- ['Orders made in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Originating Process filed on 30 July 2020.' 'Leave granted under s 444GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for the transfer of all issued shares held by each member of the Company in accordance with the DOCA.' 'Order made under s 447A of the Corporations...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment