In the matter of LMP Developments Pty Ltd and ZLM Property Holdings Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1109
Because the second meetings of creditors did not resume on the adjourned date through oversight and no resolution under s 439C was passed, the administrations had ended by operation of s 435C. However, creditors would benefit from completion of the administrator's investigations and an opportunity to decide the companies' future, there was no probable resumption of control by the directors, and s 447A was broad enough to make retrospective orders preventing the administrations from ending in these circumstances. The convening period could also be extended under s 439A(6), including after its expiry, to permit fresh meetings to be convened.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations; Voluntary Administration / Application for Orders Under Ss 447 a and 439 A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) After Adjourned Second Meetings of Creditors Were Overlooked
- Outcome
- Orders made under s 447A that the administrations did not end in the stated circumstances and under s 439A(6) extending the convening periods to 28 July 2008.
- Legal Topics
- ['voluntary Administration' 'second Meeting of Creditors' 'extension of Convening Period' 'retrospective Orders Under S 447 A' "adjournment of Creditors' Meeting"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations; Voluntary Administration / Application for Orders Under Ss 447 a and 439 A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) After Adjourned Second Meetings of Creditors Were Overlooked
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the administrations of LMP and ZLM ended when the adjourned second meetings of creditors did not resume because neither the administrator nor any creditor attended.' 'Whether the Court should make orders under s 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) so that Part 5.3A operated as if the administrations did not end in those circumstances.' 'Whether the Court should extend the convening period under s 439A(6) so that fresh second meetings of creditors could be convened.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the second meetings of creditors did not resume on the adjourned date through oversight and no resolution under s 439C was passed, the administrations had ended by operation of s 435C. However, creditors would benefit from completion of the administrator's investigations and an opportunity to decide the companies' future, there was no probable resumption of control by the directors, and s 447A was broad enough to make retrospective orders preventing the administrations from ending in these circumstances. The convening period could also be extended under s 439A(6), including after its expiry, to permit fresh meetings to be convened.
Court Disposition
Orders made under s 447A that the administrations did not end in the stated circumstances and under s 439A(6) extending the convening periods to 28 July 2008.
Orders
- ['Grants leave to the plaintiffs to file the Originating Process in these proceedings in Court.' "Notes the undertaking of the plaintiffs' solicitor to pay the filing fee in the Registry." 'Directs that the Originating Process be returnable instanter.' 'Orders pursuant to s 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment