In the matter of Daisytek Australia Pty Limited [2003] FCA 575
The Administrators established sufficient grounds for extending the convening periods: the outcome of GE's application concerning the charge, the reservation of title claims, and the possible sale or investment process were matters on which creditors should be informed, and GE and H-P either consented or did not object. Section 447A(1) empowered the Court to modify how Part 5.3A operated so that the creditors' meetings could be held during the extended convening period and the five business days thereafter, because otherwise the Administrators might be forced to wait until after 4 July 2003 to no good end, and no legislative policy underlying Part 5.3A would be frustrated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application by Voluntary Administrators / Ex Parte Application for Extension of Convening Periods for Creditors' Meetings and for Related Order About Timing of Meetings
- Outcome
- Application granted; orders made under s 439A(6) and s 447A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Legal Topics
- ['voluntary Administration' 'extension of Convening Period' "creditors' Meetings" 'operation of Part 5.3 A' 'court Powers Under S 447 A']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application by Voluntary Administrators / Ex Parte Application for Extension of Convening Periods for Creditors' Meetings and for Related Order About Timing of Meetings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the convening periods for meetings of creditors of Daisytek Australia Pty Limited and Daisytek Australia (Queensland) Pty Limited should be extended under s 439A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) until 4 July 2003.' "Whether s 447A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) empowers the Court to permit the creditors' meetings to be held during the extended convening period and the five business days thereafter, notwithstanding s 439A(2)." 'Whether discretionary considerations supported making the orders sought by the Administrators.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Administrators established sufficient grounds for extending the convening periods: the outcome of GE's application concerning the charge, the reservation of title claims, and the possible sale or investment process were matters on which creditors should be informed, and GE and H-P either consented or did not object. Section 447A(1) empowered the Court to modify how Part 5.3A operated so that the creditors' meetings could be held during the extended convening period and the five business days thereafter, because otherwise the Administrators might be forced to wait until after 4 July 2003 to no good end, and no legislative policy underlying Part 5.3A would be frustrated.
Court Disposition
Application granted; orders made under s 439A(6) and s 447A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 439A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the convening period for the meetings of creditors of Daisytek Australia Pty Limited and Daisytek Australia (Queensland) Pty Limited be extended up to and including Friday 4 July 2003.' 'Pursuant to s 447A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the meetings...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment