Strawbridge (Administrator), in the matter of CBCH Group Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 2) [2020] FCA 472
Given the exceptional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic forcing closure of stores and uncertainty about business prospects, and balancing likely prejudice to landlords (being no greater than if the premises were vacated) against creditor interests, it was appropriate and consistent with the objectives of Pt 5.3A to make orders excusing the administrators from personal liability for rent for 1–14 April 2020, and to direct that they are justified in not causing the companies to pay those rents.
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Vaughan Strawbridge, Sam Marsden and Jason Tracy in their capacity as joint and several administrators of CBCH Group Pty Ltd ACN 600 219 841, CBCH Australia Pty Ltd ACN 137 924 791, CBCH Buying Co Pty Ltd ACN 162 989 335 and Colette International Pty Ltd ACN 158 346 046; Interested Party: GPT RE Limited, GPT Funds Management Limited, Melbourne Central Custodian Pty Ltd, GPT Funds Management 2 Pty Limited (Interested Party)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application (administration) / Application for Orders and Directions
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Orders made as sought by administrators.
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Administration, Administrators' Liability, Rent Relief During Administration, COVID 19 Impact on Commercial Leases, Court Directions to Administrators
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vaughan Strawbridge, Sam Marsden and Jason Tracy in their capacity as joint and several administrators of CBCH Group Pty Ltd ACN 600 219 841, CBCH Australia Pty Ltd ACN 137 924 791, CBCH Buying Co Pty Ltd ACN 162 989 335 and Colette International Pty Ltd ACN 158 346 046
Plaintiffs
GPT RE Limited, GPT Funds Management Limited, Melbourne Central Custodian Pty Ltd, GPT Funds Management 2 Pty Limited (Interested Party)
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application (administration) / Application for Orders and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders should be made pursuant to s 447A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) varying the operation of s 443A(1)(c) and s 443B(2) to excuse administrators from personal liability for rent for a two week period.
- 2 Whether directions should be made under s 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) justifying administrators not causing companies to pay rent for that period.
Ratio Decidendi
Given the exceptional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic forcing closure of stores and uncertainty about business prospects, and balancing likely prejudice to landlords (being no greater than if the premises were vacated) against creditor interests, it was appropriate and consistent with the objectives of Pt 5.3A to make orders excusing the administrators from personal liability for rent for 1–14 April 2020, and to direct that they are justified in not causing the companies to pay those rents.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Orders made as sought by administrators.
Orders
- Certain confidential evidence and transcript to be suppressed until 15 April 2020.
- Administrators not personally liable for rent or amounts payable under specified leases for the period from the date of the order to 5 pm on 14 April 2020.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment