In the matter of Bizpay Group Limited [2024] NSWSC 1480
The administrators established that the company has no residual equity and that shareholders, including Mr Whatmore, would not receive any return on a liquidation. The evidentiary basis for claims by Mr Whatmore and access to insurance was speculative and unquantified. The DOCA extinguishing such claims remains undisturbed, and delay in seeking to set aside the DOCA militates against a finding of unfair prejudice. Accordingly, the transfer of shares under s 444GA would not unfairly prejudice the interests of members, and the application is granted.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff, Joint and Several Deed Administrator: Jonathon Sherwood Keenan; First Plaintiff, Joint and Several Deed Administrator: Peter Paul Krejci; Second Plaintiff, Company: Bizpay Group Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement); Proposed Transferee of Shares (not Applicant): BP New Start Holding Pty Ltd; Shareholder and Interested Party (objector): Mr Whatmore
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Act Deed of Company Arrangement Application for Leave to Transfer Shares / Application for Leave Under S 444 GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Final Orders
- Outcome
- Relief under s 444GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) granted to Plaintiffs; leave to transfer all shares as proposed; associated orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Administration, Deeds of Company Arrangement, Share Transfer Under S 444 GA, Shareholder Prejudice, Insurance for Company Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jonathon Sherwood Keenan
First Plaintiff, Joint and Several Deed Administrator
Peter Paul Krejci
First Plaintiff, Joint and Several Deed Administrator
Bizpay Group Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement)
Second Plaintiff, Company
BP New Start Holding Pty Ltd
Proposed Transferee of Shares (not Applicant)
Mr Whatmore
Shareholder and Interested Party (objector)
Procedural Posture
Corporations Act Deed of Company Arrangement Application for Leave to Transfer Shares / Application for Leave Under S 444 GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is residual equity in the company such that shareholders would be unfairly prejudiced by the proposed transfer of shares under s 444GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether potential shareholder claims for misrepresentations and access to D&O insurance give rise to unfair prejudice
- 3 Whether shareholders, particularly Mr Whatmore, are unfairly prejudiced in the context of the DOCA extinguishing claims
Ratio Decidendi
The administrators established that the company has no residual equity and that shareholders, including Mr Whatmore, would not receive any return on a liquidation. The evidentiary basis for claims by Mr Whatmore and access to insurance was speculative and unquantified. The DOCA extinguishing such claims remains undisturbed, and delay in seeking to set aside the DOCA militates against a finding of unfair prejudice. Accordingly, the transfer of shares under s 444GA would not unfairly prejudice the interests of members, and the application is granted.
Court Disposition
Relief under s 444GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) granted to Plaintiffs; leave to transfer all shares as proposed; associated orders made.
Orders
- Plaintiffs granted leave under s 444GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to transfer all shares in the company from each holder to BP New Start Holding Pty Ltd.
- Other associated orders as sought by the Applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment