Amirbeaggi as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Hanna v Hanna (No 3) [2024] FCA 1171
Jarvis J Pty Ltd held unit 16 as trustee for Mr Abdalla upon being put on notice of the fraudulent transfer, and must pay the value of the interest. Andrew Hanna entered into a contract for unit 21 and is liable to pay half the contract price to Mr Abdalla. Claims against Ms Shonoda for breach of contract and misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18 of the ACL fail as she was not contractually bound, had no relevant knowledge, and was not acting in trade or commerce.
- Parties
- Cross Claimant: Hedra Fayez Nashed Abdalla; First Cross Respondent: Shabnam Amirbeaggi as trustee of the bankrupt estate of John Mamdouh Hanna; Second Cross Respondent: Jarvis J Pty Limited; First Cross Respondent: Andrew Joseph Hanna; Second Cross Respondent: Eman Kamel Shonoda; Counsel for First Cross Respondent: Mr D F Elliott; Counsel for Second Cross Respondent: Mr M Bennett
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Abdalla's claims against Jarvis and Andrew Hanna succeed; claims against Ms Shonoda fail; orders in accordance with reasons to be agreed or further submissions invited.
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Transfer of Property, Fraudulent Conduct, Attribution of Knowledge, Vendor Purchaser Equitable Rights, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Proof of Contract, Partnership Dissolution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hedra Fayez Nashed Abdalla
Cross Claimant
Shabnam Amirbeaggi as trustee of the bankrupt estate of John Mamdouh Hanna
First Cross Respondent
Jarvis J Pty Limited
Second Cross Respondent
Andrew Joseph Hanna
First Cross Respondent
Eman Kamel Shonoda
Second Cross Respondent
Mr D F Elliott
Counsel for First Cross Respondent
Mr M Bennett
Counsel for Second Cross Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jarvis J Pty Ltd, as volunteer recipient of land transferred by a forged signature, held the interest on trust and is liable to account for it
- 2 Whether a contract for the sale of unit 21 between Mr Abdalla, Mr Hanna Snr, and Andrew Hanna existed and was breached
- 3 Whether Ms Shonoda was contractually liable to Mr Abdalla, or had contravened s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law by non-disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
Jarvis J Pty Ltd held unit 16 as trustee for Mr Abdalla upon being put on notice of the fraudulent transfer, and must pay the value of the interest. Andrew Hanna entered into a contract for unit 21 and is liable to pay half the contract price to Mr Abdalla. Claims against Ms Shonoda for breach of contract and misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18 of the ACL fail as she was not contractually bound, had no relevant knowledge, and was not acting in trade or commerce.
Court Disposition
Abdalla's claims against Jarvis and Andrew Hanna succeed; claims against Ms Shonoda fail; orders in accordance with reasons to be agreed or further submissions invited.
Orders
- The parties are to confer and provide to the Associate to Goodman J within 14 days agreed orders as to costs and effect of reasons, or otherwise provide competing orders and submissions.
- If competing orders and written submissions are filed, parties may reply within a further 14 days, indicating any consent to determination on the papers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment