Capel v Williams and Michell [1909] HCA 50
Setting apart Crown lands under sec. 4 of the Crown Lands Act Amendment Act 1905 does not render them unavailable for Volunteer Land Order selection. Such an application is not an application for a 'holding' under the Crown Lands Acts; as a result, the land remained open to conditional sale within the meaning of the Act, and the appellant's applications were valid.
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Daniel Capel; Defendant / Respondent (nominal Defendant on Behalf of the Government of New South Wales): James Leslie Williams; Defendant / Respondent: Francis William Michell; Defendant / Respondent: Frederick Richard Michell
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (equity), After Suit Dismissed at First Instance
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Volunteer Land Orders, Crown Lands Acts, Conditional Sale, Government Powers, Statutory Exemptions, Classification of Crown Lands
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Capel
Appellant / Plaintiff
James Leslie Williams
Defendant / Respondent (nominal Defendant on Behalf of the Government of New South Wales)
Francis William Michell
Defendant / Respondent
Frederick Richard Michell
Defendant / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (equity), After Suit Dismissed at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Crown lands set apart by the Minister under sec. 4 of the Crown Lands Act Amendment Act 1905 cease to be 'open to conditional sale' as against holders of Volunteer Land Orders
- 2 Whether the application for a free grant under the Volunteer Force Regulation Act 1867 is an application for a 'holding' within the meaning of the Crown Lands Acts
- 3 Whether the notification by the Minister affects the rights of Volunteer Land Order holders
Ratio Decidendi
Setting apart Crown lands under sec. 4 of the Crown Lands Act Amendment Act 1905 does not render them unavailable for Volunteer Land Order selection. Such an application is not an application for a 'holding' under the Crown Lands Acts; as a result, the land remained open to conditional sale within the meaning of the Act, and the appellant's applications were valid.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment and decree appealed from discharged.
- Declaration in terms of 1st and 3rd paragraph of statement of claim to be made; plaintiff's applications for grants are valid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment