Mary Hanna v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2007] NSWDC 288
The court held that the plaintiff's injury, being pedal oedema, was not caused by an 'accident' as defined under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention, whether under the original or amended statement of claim. The allocation of seats at the check-in counter does not fall within the 'operations of embarking' as required under Article 17. Moreover, the injury was not caused by an external, unexpected event but was an internal, idiopathic reaction to flying. No reasonable cause of action was disclosed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Dismiss for No Reasonable Cause of Action (ucpr 13.4)
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; Defendant's application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['warsaw Convention' 'carrier Liability' 'personal Injury on International Flights' 'accident Definition Under Article 17']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Dismiss for No Reasonable Cause of Action (ucpr 13.4)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the facts pleaded by the plaintiff disclose a reasonable cause of action under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention as applicable in Australia' "Whether the plaintiff's injury was caused by an 'accident' within the meaning of Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention" "Whether the operations of checking in for a flight fall within the 'operations of embarking' under Article 17"]
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the plaintiff's injury, being pedal oedema, was not caused by an 'accident' as defined under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention, whether under the original or amended statement of claim. The allocation of seats at the check-in counter does not fall within the 'operations of embarking' as required under Article 17. Moreover, the injury was not caused by an external, unexpected event but was an internal, idiopathic reaction to flying. No reasonable cause of action was disclosed.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; Defendant's application granted
Orders
- ['Action is dismissed under UCPR 13.4.' "Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs." 'Exhibits to be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment