Regina v Rodney Stephen Adler [2005] NSWSC 274
The offences were serious deliberate acts of dishonesty showing an appalling lack of commercial morality. The false statements about HIH share purchases were intended and likely to induce others to buy HIH shares and did distort the market. The BTS offences involved deliberate lies to obtain $2m from HIH and dishonest non-disclosure by a director seeking board ratification in his own interests. Although the offender had pleaded guilty, had some mitigating personal circumstances, had paid civil penalties and compensation, and had been disqualified from managing corporations, the seriousness of the offences and the need for general deterrence required full time imprisonment. Counts 1 and 2...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Corporations Act and Crimes Act Offences / Sentence Following Pleas of Guilty
- Outcome
- Sentenced to imprisonment for a total term of 4 years 6 months with a non-parole period of 2 years 6 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['white Collar Crime' 'disseminating False Information Likely to Induce Purchase of Securities' 'obtaining Money by False or Misleading Statements' "dishonest Breach of Directors' Duties" 'general Deterrence' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Corporations Act and Crimes Act Offences / Sentence Following Pleas of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentences should be imposed for two counts of disseminating false information likely to induce purchase of HIH shares, one count of obtaining money by false or misleading statements, and one count of dishonest breach of directors' duties." 'Whether the seriousness of the offences and the need for general deterrence required full time imprisonment.' "How the offender's guilty pleas, prior character, remorse, earlier civil penalty proceedings, and family circumstances should affect sentence." 'How concurrency, accumulation, totality, and the different Commonwealth and New South Wales sentencing regimes should be applied.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offences were serious deliberate acts of dishonesty showing an appalling lack of commercial morality. The false statements about HIH share purchases were intended and likely to induce others to buy HIH shares and did distort the market. The BTS offences involved deliberate lies to obtain $2m from HIH and dishonest non-disclosure by a director seeking board ratification in his own interests. Although the offender had pleaded guilty, had some mitigating personal circumstances, had paid civil penalties and compensation, and had been disqualified from managing corporations, the seriousness of the offences and the need for general deterrence required full time imprisonment. Counts 1 and 2...
Court Disposition
Sentenced to imprisonment for a total term of 4 years 6 months with a non-parole period of 2 years 6 months.
Orders
- ['On counts 1 and 2, the offender was sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years 6 months on each count, concurrent with each other, commencing 14 April 2005 and expiring 13 October 2007.' 'On count 4, the offender was sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years, partly concurrent and partly cumulative on counts 1 and 2,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment