In the matter of Sans Pareil Estate Pty Ltd (in liq) [2024] NSWSC 255
Identified payments by the principal Sans Pareil companies to, for, or on behalf of Aaron Salvestrin, being for his personal benefit and without commercial justification, constituted unreasonable director-related transactions within s 588FDA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), were voidable under s 588FE(6A), and the evidentiary onus to provide a commercial explanation having not been discharged by the defendant, the court ordered restitution of the total value of such benefits for the benefit of company creditors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (corporations List) / Principal Judgment After Hearing (final Orders)
- Outcome
- Unreasonable director-related transactions declared voidable; third defendant ordered to pay identified amounts to plaintiff companies and pay costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' 'voidable Transactions' 'unreasonable Director Related Transactions' "director's Statutory Duties" 'recovery of Company Property in Liquidation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil (corporations List) / Principal Judgment After Hearing (final Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether identified payments by Sans Pareil group companies to or for the benefit of Aaron Salvestrin were unreasonable director-related transactions under s 588FDA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and voidable under s 588FE(6A)' 'Whether the third defendant is liable to repay the total value of such payments under s 588FF(1)(a) for the benefit of company creditors']
Ratio Decidendi
Identified payments by the principal Sans Pareil companies to, for, or on behalf of Aaron Salvestrin, being for his personal benefit and without commercial justification, constituted unreasonable director-related transactions within s 588FDA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), were voidable under s 588FE(6A), and the evidentiary onus to provide a commercial explanation having not been discharged by the defendant, the court ordered restitution of the total value of such benefits for the benefit of company creditors.
Court Disposition
Unreasonable director-related transactions declared voidable; third defendant ordered to pay identified amounts to plaintiff companies and pay costs.
Orders
- ['Declaration that each of the relevant transactions is an unreasonable director-related transaction within s 588FDA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Declaration that each such transaction is voidable under s 588FE(6A) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Order that the third defendant (Aaron Salvestrin) pay...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment