In the matter of Kevin Jacobsen Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 1539
The examination remains extant due to the liberty to resume within six months, preserving the relevance and proper connection of the order for production with the examination. The order for production was within its proper limits, and the application to set it aside fails. Privilege claims over certain documents must be determined before access is granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Direction on Privilege Claims and Set Aside Application
- Outcome
- Application to set aside production order refused; directions made for privilege claims; costs ordered against examinee.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' 'examination of Officers' 'order for Production' 'privilege Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Direction on Privilege Claims and Set Aside Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the order for production of documents should be set aside after partial compliance and examination has been stood over' 'Whether a continuing connection exists between examination and production order for documents provided after the examination was stood over' 'Whether privilege claims over certain documents require a separate determination']
Ratio Decidendi
The examination remains extant due to the liberty to resume within six months, preserving the relevance and proper connection of the order for production with the examination. The order for production was within its proper limits, and the application to set it aside fails. Privilege claims over certain documents must be determined before access is granted.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside production order refused; directions made for privilege claims; costs ordered against examinee.
Orders
- ['Any interlocutory process seeking privilege orders to be filed and served within seven days and returnable at 10am on 30 January 2012.' 'Until further order, no access to documents where privilege is claimed.' "Mr Lord to pay the liquidators' costs of the interlocutory process."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment