In the matter of HIH Underwriting Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd (in liquidation and subject to a scheme of arrangement) [2015] NSWSC 36
It is just and equitable to direct that the reinsurance receipts be paid to the applicant creditors (after deduction of expenses and any prior distribution) and not be distributed according to s 562A(2)–(3), given the applicants contracted for specific reinsurance cover, paid the relevant premiums, and would be severely prejudiced by application of the statutory allocation.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Amaca Pty Ltd (under NSW administered winding up); Second Plaintiff: Amaba Pty Ltd (under NSW administered winding up); Third Plaintiff: ABN 60 Pty Ltd (under NSW administered winding up); First Defendant: A G McGrath & C J Honey as liquidators of the HIH Group of Companies; Second Defendant: HIH Underwriting & Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd (in liquidation and subject to a scheme of arrangement)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application for Orders During Liquidation / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Orders as sought by consent; reinsurance receipts to be paid to the First Plaintiff after deductions; no order as to costs; matter stood over.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Reinsurance Proceeds, Liquidator's Application, Application of Insurance Recoveries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amaca Pty Ltd (under NSW administered winding up)
First Plaintiff
Amaba Pty Ltd (under NSW administered winding up)
Second Plaintiff
ABN 60 Pty Ltd (under NSW administered winding up)
Third Plaintiff
A G McGrath & C J Honey as liquidators of the HIH Group of Companies
First Defendant
HIH Underwriting & Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd (in liquidation and subject to a scheme of arrangement)
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application for Orders During Liquidation / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is just and equitable to order that s 562A(2) and (3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) not apply to specific reinsurance receipts and those receipts instead be paid to the applicant creditors.
Ratio Decidendi
It is just and equitable to direct that the reinsurance receipts be paid to the applicant creditors (after deduction of expenses and any prior distribution) and not be distributed according to s 562A(2)–(3), given the applicants contracted for specific reinsurance cover, paid the relevant premiums, and would be severely prejudiced by application of the statutory allocation.
Court Disposition
Orders as sought by consent; reinsurance receipts to be paid to the First Plaintiff after deductions; no order as to costs; matter stood over.
Orders
- Subsections 562A(2) and 562A(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) do not apply to $226,339 from Peoples Insurance Company of China and $74,420 from Nipponkoa Insurance Company Limited.
- Receipts must be applied by the Defendants by deducting expenses incidental to each receipt (2.5% for Nippon receipt; 20% for PICC receipt), deducting any dividends or distributions already paid, and paying the balance to the First Plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment