In the matter of Burning Palms Pty Ltd (in liq) - Inglis v Lord & Crowe-Maxwell (as liquidators) [2008] NSWSC 585
The Court ordered a liquidators' report because the plaintiff's evidence showed significant payments to the liquidators and identified outstanding creditors, while the liquidators had not provided adequate particulars, had not appeared, and had supplied only an incomplete and unsatisfactory schedule. In those circumstances, the need for a report on receipts, disbursements, creditors, fees and solvency before the termination application was compelling.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 482(1) of the Corporations Act to Stay or Terminate the Winding Up of Burning Palms Pty Limited (in Liq), With Interlocutory Process Seeking a Liquidators' Report Under S 482(2) / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Process
- Outcome
- Order made under s 482(2) requiring the liquidators to provide a report to the Court and the plaintiff; costs reserved and proceedings stood over.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' 'termination or Stay of Winding Up' "liquidators' Report" 'company Solvency' 'creditors and Liquidation Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 482(1) of the Corporations Act to Stay or Terminate the Winding Up of Burning Palms Pty Limited (in Liq), With Interlocutory Process Seeking a Liquidators' Report Under S 482(2) / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Process
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should direct the liquidators under s 482(2) to provide a report on relevant financial matters before determining the application to stay or terminate the winding up.' 'Whether the liquidators had failed to provide sufficient financial information about receipts, disbursements, creditors, fees and solvency.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court ordered a liquidators' report because the plaintiff's evidence showed significant payments to the liquidators and identified outstanding creditors, while the liquidators had not provided adequate particulars, had not appeared, and had supplied only an incomplete and unsatisfactory schedule. In those circumstances, the need for a report on receipts, disbursements, creditors, fees and solvency before the termination application was compelling.
Court Disposition
Order made under s 482(2) requiring the liquidators to provide a report to the Court and the plaintiff; costs reserved and proceedings stood over.
Orders
- ['Order in terms of para 1 of the interlocutory process.' "Without limiting the generality of order 1, the first defendant's report is to reconcile the information it contains with the information in the affidavits of the plaintiff made on 11 and 24 April 2008 with respect to payments made or to be made to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment