In the matter of Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2013] NSWSC 1293
The Court found the liquidator's decision to enter the litigation funding agreement was a proper exercise of power, involving no lack of good faith or error of law or principle, and approval was justified. The proposed agreement was reasonable and in the creditors' interests, and a direction under s 479(3) was appropriate in the circumstances.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff, Liquidator of Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Limited (in Liquidation): Christopher Mel Chamberlain; Second Plaintiff, Company in Liquidation: Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Limited (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Proceeding, Interlocutory Application for Approval of Funding Agreement / Interlocutory Application, Orders Sought Under S 477(2 B) and S 479(3) Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
- Outcome
- Approval granted for entry into funding agreement; direction given protecting liquidator; confidentiality orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Litigation Funding, Liquidator's Powers, Creditor Interests, Court Directions to Liquidator
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Mel Chamberlain
First Plaintiff, Liquidator of Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Limited (in Liquidation)
Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Limited (in liquidation)
Second Plaintiff, Company in Liquidation
Procedural Posture
Corporations Proceeding, Interlocutory Application for Approval of Funding Agreement / Interlocutory Application, Orders Sought Under S 477(2 B) and S 479(3) Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether approval should be granted under s 477(2B) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for entry into a litigation funding agreement by the liquidator
- 2 Whether a direction under s 479(3) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) should be made to justify the liquidator entering into the funding agreement and protect the liquidator from future claims
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the liquidator's decision to enter the litigation funding agreement was a proper exercise of power, involving no lack of good faith or error of law or principle, and approval was justified. The proposed agreement was reasonable and in the creditors' interests, and a direction under s 479(3) was appropriate in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Approval granted for entry into funding agreement; direction given protecting liquidator; confidentiality orders made.
Orders
- Approval granted under s 477(2B) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for entry into funding agreement.
- Direction given under s 479(3) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) justifying the liquidator's decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment