Hickie v Land Enviro Corp Pty Limited, in the matter of Land and Enviro Corp Pty Limited [2014] FCA 1386

Hickie v Land Enviro Corp Pty Limited, in the matter of Land and Enviro Corp Pty Limited [2014] FCA 1386

The defendants failed to comply with statutory demands founded on unsatisfied costs judgments and admitted actual insolvency. There was no basis to find that the plaintiffs caused the defendants' insolvency, no appeal remained against the plaintiffs, any possible recovery from litigation against other parties was uncertain and would require lengthy further proceedings, and no special circumstances justified an adjournment or refusal of winding up. The formal requirements for winding up were satisfied, so winding up orders were made.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 December 2014
Procedural Posture
Applications for Winding Up in Insolvency / Final Judgment on Creditors' Winding Up Applications After Non Compliance With Statutory Demands
Outcome
The defendants were wound up in insolvency and Robert Whitton was appointed as official liquidator of each defendant.
Legal Topics
['winding Up in Insolvency' 'statutory Demand' 'presumption of Insolvency' 'discretion to Adjourn Winding Up Application' 'discretion to Refuse Winding Up Order' 'abuse of Process']
['corporations' 'insolvency'] ['winding Up in Insolvency' 'statutory Demand' 'presumption of Insolvency' 'discretion to Adjourn Winding Up Application' 'discretion to Refuse Winding Up Order' 'abuse of Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Applications for Winding Up in Insolvency / Final Judgment on Creditors' Winding Up Applications After Non Compliance With Statutory Demands

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendants should be wound up in insolvency after failing to comply with statutory demands founded on assessed costs judgments.' 'Whether the Court should exercise discretion under s 467 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to adjourn the winding up applications pending appeal proceedings against other parties.' 'Whether there was any basis to refuse winding up orders notwithstanding admitted insolvency.' 'Whether the winding up applications were an abuse of process.']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants failed to comply with statutory demands founded on unsatisfied costs judgments and admitted actual insolvency. There was no basis to find that the plaintiffs caused the defendants' insolvency, no appeal remained against the plaintiffs, any possible recovery from litigation against other parties was uncertain and would require lengthy further proceedings, and no special circumstances justified an adjournment or refusal of winding up. The formal requirements for winding up were satisfied, so winding up orders were made.

Court Disposition

The defendants were wound up in insolvency and Robert Whitton was appointed as official liquidator of each defendant.

Orders

  • ['In NSD 918 of 2014, the defendant be wound up in insolvency.' 'In NSD 918 of 2014, Robert Whitton be appointed as official liquidator of the defendant.' 'In NSD 918 of 2014, the costs of the plaintiffs are to be payable out of the assets of the defendant in accordance with s 556 of the Act.' 'In NSD 919 of 2014,...