Re ACN 059 849 017 Pty Ltd & The Corporations Law [1999] NSWSC 576
The Court was satisfied that the director had leave to apply because the administrator's report provided a prima facie case of insolvency, that Pt 5.4 of the Corporations Law did not require a valid statutory demand as the exclusive route to winding up in insolvency, and that the invalid administration did not prevent Mr Lewis being appointed liquidator; accordingly the winding up orders were made, with substituted advertisement requirements.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Wind Up a Company in Insolvency / Ex Parte Hearing of Summons
- Outcome
- Orders 1 to 4 in the summons made; prescribed advertisements dispensed with subject to publication of an advertisement in Form 154B mutatis mutandis in the prescribed newspaper within ten days.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up in Insolvency' 'statutory Demand' 'leave for Director to Apply for Winding Up' 'appointment of Liquidator' 'advertisement of Winding Up Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Wind Up a Company in Insolvency / Ex Parte Hearing of Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a director should be granted leave under s 459P of the Corporations Law to apply for winding up in insolvency.' 'Whether Pt 5.4 of the Corporations Law permits winding up in insolvency where no valid statutory demand has been served.' 'Whether advertisements prescribed by the Regulations should be dispensed with.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the director had leave to apply because the administrator's report provided a prima facie case of insolvency, that Pt 5.4 of the Corporations Law did not require a valid statutory demand as the exclusive route to winding up in insolvency, and that the invalid administration did not prevent Mr Lewis being appointed liquidator; accordingly the winding up orders were made, with substituted advertisement requirements.
Court Disposition
Orders 1 to 4 in the summons made; prescribed advertisements dispensed with subject to publication of an advertisement in Form 154B mutatis mutandis in the prescribed newspaper within ten days.
Orders
- ['Orders 1 to 4 in the summons made.' 'All advertisements prescribed by the Regulations dispensed with, provided that an advertisement in Form 154B mutatis mutandis is published in the prescribed newspaper within ten days.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment