Gebo Investments (Labuan) Ltd v Signatory Investments Pty Ltd; Application of Campbell & Ors [2005] NSWSC 544

Gebo Investments (Labuan) Ltd v Signatory Investments Pty Ltd; Application of Campbell & Ors [2005] NSWSC 544

LifeWealth 8 Limited (Labuan) carried on business in Australia within the statutory meaning and the common law concept, as evidenced by local director control, business meetings in Australia, contracts entered into and performed in Australia, and business activities directed from Australia. Therefore, the company was a 'Part 5.7 body' at relevant times, giving the court jurisdiction to appoint a provisional liquidator and to entertain a winding up application under s.583 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); cessation of business in Australia prior to application does not remove jurisdiction. Consequently, the amended interlocutory process seeking to set aside the provisional liquidator's...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Corporations Winding Up / Interlocutory Applications for Orders Concerning Provisional Liquidator and Winding Up Jurisdiction
Outcome
Amended interlocutory process filed 24 December 2004 dismissed. Interlocutory process filed 29 March 2005 stood over for consequential orders.
Legal Topics
['winding Up of Foreign Companies' 'jurisdiction Under Corporations Act' 'carrying on Business in Australia' 'appointment/removal of Provisional Liquidator']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Winding Up / Interlocutory Applications for Orders Concerning Provisional Liquidator and Winding Up Jurisdiction

  1. 1 ["Whether LifeWealth 8 Limited (Labuan) is a 'Part 5.7 body' under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for winding up purposes; whether the court has jurisdiction to appoint a provisional liquidator for such an entity; whether carrying on business in Australia requires current business operation; what constitutes 'carrying on business in Australia'; whether acts relating to internet-based business and business activities conducted from Australia meet statutory and common law tests."]

Ratio Decidendi

LifeWealth 8 Limited (Labuan) carried on business in Australia within the statutory meaning and the common law concept, as evidenced by local director control, business meetings in Australia, contracts entered into and performed in Australia, and business activities directed from Australia. Therefore, the company was a 'Part 5.7 body' at relevant times, giving the court jurisdiction to appoint a provisional liquidator and to entertain a winding up application under s.583 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); cessation of business in Australia prior to application does not remove jurisdiction. Consequently, the amended interlocutory process seeking to set aside the provisional liquidator's...

Court Disposition

Amended interlocutory process filed 24 December 2004 dismissed. Interlocutory process filed 29 March 2005 stood over for consequential orders.

Orders

  • ['Amended interlocutory process filed 24 December 2004 is dismissed.' 'Interlocutory process filed 29 March 2005 stood over to 20 June 2005 for listing and consequential orders.']