Gebo Investments (Labuan) Ltd v Signatory Investments Pty Ltd; Application of Campbell & Ors [2005] NSWSC 544
LifeWealth 8 Limited (Labuan) carried on business in Australia within the statutory meaning and the common law concept, as evidenced by local director control, business meetings in Australia, contracts entered into and performed in Australia, and business activities directed from Australia. Therefore, the company was a 'Part 5.7 body' at relevant times, giving the court jurisdiction to appoint a provisional liquidator and to entertain a winding up application under s.583 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); cessation of business in Australia prior to application does not remove jurisdiction. Consequently, the amended interlocutory process seeking to set aside the provisional liquidator's...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Winding Up / Interlocutory Applications for Orders Concerning Provisional Liquidator and Winding Up Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Amended interlocutory process filed 24 December 2004 dismissed. Interlocutory process filed 29 March 2005 stood over for consequential orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up of Foreign Companies' 'jurisdiction Under Corporations Act' 'carrying on Business in Australia' 'appointment/removal of Provisional Liquidator']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Winding Up / Interlocutory Applications for Orders Concerning Provisional Liquidator and Winding Up Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether LifeWealth 8 Limited (Labuan) is a 'Part 5.7 body' under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for winding up purposes; whether the court has jurisdiction to appoint a provisional liquidator for such an entity; whether carrying on business in Australia requires current business operation; what constitutes 'carrying on business in Australia'; whether acts relating to internet-based business and business activities conducted from Australia meet statutory and common law tests."]
Ratio Decidendi
LifeWealth 8 Limited (Labuan) carried on business in Australia within the statutory meaning and the common law concept, as evidenced by local director control, business meetings in Australia, contracts entered into and performed in Australia, and business activities directed from Australia. Therefore, the company was a 'Part 5.7 body' at relevant times, giving the court jurisdiction to appoint a provisional liquidator and to entertain a winding up application under s.583 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); cessation of business in Australia prior to application does not remove jurisdiction. Consequently, the amended interlocutory process seeking to set aside the provisional liquidator's...
Court Disposition
Amended interlocutory process filed 24 December 2004 dismissed. Interlocutory process filed 29 March 2005 stood over for consequential orders.
Orders
- ['Amended interlocutory process filed 24 December 2004 is dismissed.' 'Interlocutory process filed 29 March 2005 stood over to 20 June 2005 for listing and consequential orders.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment