NSI Group Pty Ltd v Mokas [2006] NSWSC 1077
The without prejudice correspondence was admissible because, insofar as it was relied on to establish an implied agreement to abandon the alleged settlement agreement, it fell within s 131(2)(f); alternatively, if not within that paragraph, it fell within s 131(2)(g) because without it the Court would be likely to be misled.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Evidence Ruling in Equity Division Proceedings / Admissibility Objection to Without Prejudice Correspondence
- Outcome
- Without prejudice material admitted under exceptions to section 131 of the Evidence Act 1995.
- Legal Topics
- ['without Prejudice Communications' 'admissions' 'settlement Communications' 'exceptions to Inadmissibility Under Evidence Act 1995 S 131']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Evidence Ruling in Equity Division Proceedings / Admissibility Objection to Without Prejudice Correspondence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether correspondence marked without prejudice was admissible despite s 131 of the Evidence Act 1995.' 'Whether alleged abandonment of a settlement agreement fell within exceptions in s 131(2), including s 131(2)(f) or s 131(2)(g).']
Ratio Decidendi
The without prejudice correspondence was admissible because, insofar as it was relied on to establish an implied agreement to abandon the alleged settlement agreement, it fell within s 131(2)(f); alternatively, if not within that paragraph, it fell within s 131(2)(g) because without it the Court would be likely to be misled.
Court Disposition
Without prejudice material admitted under exceptions to section 131 of the Evidence Act 1995.
Orders
- ["Paragraphs of Mr Mokas' evidence which were objected to admitted." 'Bundle of disputed documents admitted as exhibit DX101 to 110.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment