Pihiga Pty Ltd v Roche [2011] FCA 240

Pihiga Pty Ltd v Roche [2011] FCA 240

Evidence of communications and documents produced during mediation between the parties is admissible in this proceeding. The common law 'without prejudice' rule, and the related contractual obligation of confidentiality in the mediation agreement, admit of exceptions where a party seeks to set aside a settlement agreement for misrepresentation or misleading or deceptive conduct. Section 131(2)(f) and (i) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) are engaged, permitting admission of evidence relevant to the enforceability of the settlement deed and to the applicants' statutory claims. There are no discretionary grounds under s 135(a) to exclude such evidence. The respondents' application for an...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Application and Cross Claim (declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Specific Performance, and Damages) / Interlocutory Decision on Notice of Motion Regarding Admissibility of Evidence and Injunction, Before Substantive Trial
Outcome
Respondents' notice of motion dismissed. Evidence referred to in the notice of motion is admissible (subject to other objections).
Legal Topics
['without Prejudice Privilege' 'admissibility of Mediation Communications' 'exceptions to Without Prejudice Rule' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'rescission and Specific Performance of Settlement Deed']
['practice and Procedure' 'evidence' 'corporations' 'contract' 'trade Practices'] ['without Prejudice Privilege' 'admissibility of Mediation Communications' 'exceptions to Without Prejudice Rule' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'rescission and Specific Performance of Settlement Deed']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application and Cross Claim (declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Specific Performance, and Damages) / Interlocutory Decision on Notice of Motion Regarding Admissibility of Evidence and Injunction, Before Substantive Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether evidence of mediation discussions and documents is admissible in proceedings where misleading and deceptive conduct and a challenge to a settlement deed are alleged' "Scope of the 'without prejudice' rule at common law and its exceptions in statutory and contractual context" 'Whether the mediation agreement prohibits introduction of mediation documents as evidence' 'Application of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 131 to mediation evidence, and engagement of its exceptions']

Ratio Decidendi

Evidence of communications and documents produced during mediation between the parties is admissible in this proceeding. The common law 'without prejudice' rule, and the related contractual obligation of confidentiality in the mediation agreement, admit of exceptions where a party seeks to set aside a settlement agreement for misrepresentation or misleading or deceptive conduct. Section 131(2)(f) and (i) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) are engaged, permitting admission of evidence relevant to the enforceability of the settlement deed and to the applicants' statutory claims. There are no discretionary grounds under s 135(a) to exclude such evidence. The respondents' application for an...

Court Disposition

Respondents' notice of motion dismissed. Evidence referred to in the notice of motion is admissible (subject to other objections).

Orders

  • ["The respondents' notice of motion of 10 March 2011 be dismissed."]