The Owners – Strata Plan No 76902 v Roads and Maritime Services ABN 76 236 371 [2017] NSWSC 528
The court found that the subpoenaed documents are relevant and not an abuse of process; privilege does not attach to most of the PSM documents, or if it does, it has been waived by the WBF Parties having relied on the expert advice in support of settlement reasonableness. Disclosure of documents in categories 10 and 23 is necessary for resolving the real issues in dispute, as these documents relate to the scope and cost of works forming part of the claim.
- Parties
- Seventh Defendant; Second Cross Defendant to Second Cross Claim: Taylor Thomson Whitting (NSW) Pty Ltd; Second Defendant; First Cross Claimant to Second Cross Claim: Walsh Bay Finance Pty Ltd; Third Defendant; Second Cross Claimant to Second Cross Claim: Mirvac (Walsh Bay) Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant; Third Cross Claimant to Second Cross Claim: Transfield (Walsh Bay) Pty Ltd; Sixth Defendant; Fourth Cross Claimant to Second Cross Claim: Mirvac Design Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Technology and Construction List / Procedural Ruling on Disclosure/subpoena, Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Orders made granting access to subpoenaed documents, ordering disclosure of documents in categories 10 and 23, reserving costs, standing over balance of the application.
- Legal Topics
- Witness Documents, Client Legal Privilege, Disclosure and Discovery, Waiver of Privilege, Procedural Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Taylor Thomson Whitting (NSW) Pty Ltd
Seventh Defendant; Second Cross Defendant to Second Cross Claim
Walsh Bay Finance Pty Ltd
Second Defendant; First Cross Claimant to Second Cross Claim
Mirvac (Walsh Bay) Pty Ltd
Third Defendant; Second Cross Claimant to Second Cross Claim
Transfield (Walsh Bay) Pty Ltd
Fourth Defendant; Third Cross Claimant to Second Cross Claim
Mirvac Design Pty Ltd
Sixth Defendant; Fourth Cross Claimant to Second Cross Claim
Procedural Posture
Equity Technology and Construction List / Procedural Ruling on Disclosure/subpoena, Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether subpoena for the production of documents should be set aside
- 2 Whether documents sought are subject to client legal privilege
- 3 Whether privilege has been waived by the party claiming it
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the subpoenaed documents are relevant and not an abuse of process; privilege does not attach to most of the PSM documents, or if it does, it has been waived by the WBF Parties having relied on the expert advice in support of settlement reasonableness. Disclosure of documents in categories 10 and 23 is necessary for resolving the real issues in dispute, as these documents relate to the scope and cost of works forming part of the claim.
Court Disposition
Orders made granting access to subpoenaed documents, ordering disclosure of documents in categories 10 and 23, reserving costs, standing over balance of the application.
Orders
- TTW granted access to documents produced in answer to subpoena dated 20 May 2016 addressed to Pell Sullivan Meynink Pty Limited.
- Cross claimants to the second cross-claim to provide disclosure of documents falling within categories 10 and 23 as per amended notice of motion filed on 24 April 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment