Southern Cross University v Andrews [2022] NSWIRComm 1108
Considering the complexity of the matter, possible criminal penalties, and that named HR personnel could not appropriately represent the Notifier, leave was granted for the Notifier to be represented by one solicitor and one barrister at the conciliation.
- Parties
- Notifier: Southern Cross University; First Respondent: Josh Andrews; Second Respondent: National Tertiary Education Union
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Notification of Dispute Under Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (nsw) / Application for Leave for Legal Representation in Conciliation
- Outcome
- Leave is granted to the Notifier to be represented at the conciliation of this matter by one solicitor and one barrister.
- Legal Topics
- Work Health and Safety, Representation in Conciliation Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Southern Cross University
Notifier
Josh Andrews
First Respondent
National Tertiary Education Union
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notification of Dispute Under Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (nsw) / Application for Leave for Legal Representation in Conciliation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to the Notifier to be represented at conciliation by legal practitioners under s 166(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
Considering the complexity of the matter, possible criminal penalties, and that named HR personnel could not appropriately represent the Notifier, leave was granted for the Notifier to be represented by one solicitor and one barrister at the conciliation.
Court Disposition
Leave is granted to the Notifier to be represented at the conciliation of this matter by one solicitor and one barrister.
Orders
- Leave granted for Notifier to be represented at conciliation by one solicitor and one barrister.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment