R v XU [2010] NSWDC 148
A fixed term of twelve months imprisonment was imposed for supplying cannabis, and for wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, a non-parole period of two and a half years and a head sentence of four and a half years was imposed, taking into account the offender's substantial assistance to authorities, early guilty plea, lack of prior offences, and custodial hardship due to protection; the total effective sentence must balance objective seriousness, legislative constraints, and discounts for assistance, while remaining proportionate to the offending.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Offender: Liang Gary Xu
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to a fixed term of twelve months imprisonment for cannabis supply and a non-parole period of two and a half years with a head sentence of four and a half years for wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, with sentences partially accumulated as per the totality principle.
- Legal Topics
- Wounding With Intent to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm, Supply Prohibited Drug, Sentencing, Assistance to Authorities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Liang Gary Xu
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for offence of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm
- 2 Appropriate sentence for supplying a prohibited drug (cannabis)
- 3 Consideration of discount for assistance to authorities and guilty plea
Ratio Decidendi
A fixed term of twelve months imprisonment was imposed for supplying cannabis, and for wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, a non-parole period of two and a half years and a head sentence of four and a half years was imposed, taking into account the offender's substantial assistance to authorities, early guilty plea, lack of prior offences, and custodial hardship due to protection; the total effective sentence must balance objective seriousness, legislative constraints, and discounts for assistance, while remaining proportionate to the offending.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to a fixed term of twelve months imprisonment for cannabis supply and a non-parole period of two and a half years with a head sentence of four and a half years for wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, with sentences partially accumulated as per the totality principle.
Orders
- For supplying cannabis: fixed term of 12 months imprisonment from 8 April 2009
- For wounding with intent: non-parole period of 2.5 years from 8 October 2009 to 7 April 2012; head sentence of 4.5 years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment