R v Francis [2020] NSWDC 635
Manning Francis wounded the complainant with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, but at the time was suffering from a disease of the mind causing a defect of reason and inability to appreciate the moral wrongfulness of his actions. Therefore, the defence of mental illness was established, and a special verdict of not guilty by reason of mental illness is returned.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial Judge Alone, Special Verdict
- Outcome
- Special verdict - not guilty by reason of mental illness
- Legal Topics
- ['wound With Intent' 'defence of Mental Illness' 'trial by Judge Alone' 'special Verdict']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Judge Alone, Special Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Manning Francis is guilty of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm' 'Whether the defence of mental illness applies']
Ratio Decidendi
Manning Francis wounded the complainant with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, but at the time was suffering from a disease of the mind causing a defect of reason and inability to appreciate the moral wrongfulness of his actions. Therefore, the defence of mental illness was established, and a special verdict of not guilty by reason of mental illness is returned.
Court Disposition
Special verdict - not guilty by reason of mental illness
Orders
- ['Manning Francis is to continue to be detained in custody preferably at the Hamden Unit or Long Bay Hospital or as may be determined by the Mental Health Review Tribunal.' 'Registrar must notify the Minister for Health, the Mental Health Review Tribunal, and Justice Health as soon as reasonably practicable of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment