Director of Public Prosecutions v JJ and SH [2011] NSWChC 2

Director of Public Prosecutions v JJ and SH [2011] NSWChC 2

Although both young people had prospects of rehabilitation if given appropriate guidance and assistance, the substantive offences involved dangerous, antisocial and reprehensible behaviour, including serious robberies and the theft of a wallet from the deceased Mr Ferrier. The seriousness of the offending, the need for general deterrence and punishment, JJ's sufficient maturity, and SH's lengthy criminal history and offending while subject to a good behaviour bond and probation order outweighed the factors favouring summary disposal. The Children's Court found that the matters could not properly be disposed of summarily because sentencing them in that Court would result in sentences that...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceedings Involving Young Offenders Who Pleaded Guilty to Robbery, Attempted Robbery and Larceny or Stealing Offences / Decision Whether the Matters Should Remain in the Children's Court for Summary Sentence or Be Committed to the District Court for Sentence
Outcome
Both young people were committed for sentence in the District Court of New South Wales on a date to be fixed.
Legal Topics
['young Offenders' 'robbery in Company' 'attempted Robbery' 'larceny' 'form 1 Offences' "summary Disposal in the Children's Court" 'committal for Sentence' 'rehabilitation and General Deterrence']
['criminal Law' "children's Criminal Proceedings" 'sentencing'] ['young Offenders' 'robbery in Company' 'attempted Robbery' 'larceny' 'form 1 Offences' "summary Disposal in the Children's Court" 'committal for Sentence' 'rehabilitation and General Deterrence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Proceedings Involving Young Offenders Who Pleaded Guilty to Robbery, Attempted Robbery and Larceny or Stealing Offences / Decision Whether the Matters Should Remain in the Children's Court for Summary Sentence or Be Committed to the District Court for Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether, under section 31(5) of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, the charges against JJ and SH may not properly be disposed of in a summary manner in the Children's Court." 'What weight should be given to rehabilitation, youth, maturity, criminal history, seriousness of offending, general deterrence and responsibility for the offences when deciding the proper sentencing forum.']

Ratio Decidendi

Although both young people had prospects of rehabilitation if given appropriate guidance and assistance, the substantive offences involved dangerous, antisocial and reprehensible behaviour, including serious robberies and the theft of a wallet from the deceased Mr Ferrier. The seriousness of the offending, the need for general deterrence and punishment, JJ's sufficient maturity, and SH's lengthy criminal history and offending while subject to a good behaviour bond and probation order outweighed the factors favouring summary disposal. The Children's Court found that the matters could not properly be disposed of summarily because sentencing them in that Court would result in sentences that...

Court Disposition

Both young people were committed for sentence in the District Court of New South Wales on a date to be fixed.

Orders

  • ['JJ and SH are committed for sentence in the District Court of New South Wales on a date to be fixed.' 'An updated Confidential Background Report is to be prepared for the use of the sentencing judge.' 'Pursuant to section 34(4) of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, the judgment is to be issued forthwith...