Hawach v A & A Building Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWCATAP 234

Hawach v A & A Building Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWCATAP 234

The respondent was wholly successful in the appeal and, as the amount in dispute exceeded $30,000, the general rule that costs follow the event applies pursuant to r 38A of the NCAT Rules; there is no reason to depart from this principle and the appellants are to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Parties
First Appellant: Joseph Hawach; Second Appellant: Sarah Reimers; Respondent: A & A Building Services Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal Dismissed
Outcome
Appeal costs ordered against appellants; oral hearing on costs dispensed with.
Legal Topics
Costs, Appeal Costs, Costs Follow the Event, NCAT Procedures

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Hawach

First Appellant

Sarah Reimers

Second Appellant

A & A Building Services Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Internal Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal Dismissed

  1. 1 Whether an order for costs should be made against the unsuccessful appellants in the appeal proceedings
  2. 2 Whether 'special circumstances' are required for a costs order in this internal appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent was wholly successful in the appeal and, as the amount in dispute exceeded $30,000, the general rule that costs follow the event applies pursuant to r 38A of the NCAT Rules; there is no reason to depart from this principle and the appellants are to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal costs ordered against appellants; oral hearing on costs dispensed with.

Orders

  • An oral hearing on the issue of costs is dispensed with under s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).
  • The appellants, Joseph Hawach and Sarah Reimers, are to pay the costs of the respondent A & A Building Services Pty Ltd of the appeal proceedings as agreed or assessed on the ordinary basis.