R v A [2004] NSWCCA 292

R v A [2004] NSWCCA 292

Although the sentencing judge did not expressly quantify the discount for the Applicant's plea and assistance, the imposed sentence was not outside the permissible range taking into account her assistance, the repeal of s 16G, and comparable cases. Leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed, as no sentencing error warranting a lesser sentence was found.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (court of Criminal Appeal, After Guilty Plea in District Court)
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['importation of Heroin' 'sentence Appeal' 'sentencing Discounts' 'assistance to Authorities' 'repeal of S 16 G Crimes Act 1914']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (court of Criminal Appeal, After Guilty Plea in District Court)

  1. 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge gave adequate consideration to the discount for the Applicant's assistance to authorities" 'Proper approach to sentencing discount after the repeal of s 16G Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)' 'Appropriate range of sentences for heroin couriers post-repeal']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the sentencing judge did not expressly quantify the discount for the Applicant's plea and assistance, the imposed sentence was not outside the permissible range taking into account her assistance, the repeal of s 16G, and comparable cases. Leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed, as no sentencing error warranting a lesser sentence was found.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']