A Ltd v J (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 896
The Court granted leave and authorised a revised statutory will because the Child lacked testamentary capacity, the s 19 information had been provided, the s 22 requirements were satisfied, and it was reasonably likely that a person in the Child's position with testamentary capacity would make a new will accounting for the possible payment of superannuation death benefits outside the estate. The appropriate will was one that left the Mother 42.5% of residue, divided the balance equally between the Father and the six siblings, required adjustment so far as possible for superannuation death benefits paid to residuary beneficiaries, and held residuary shares on testamentary trusts.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave and for an Order Authorising a Statutory Will Under the Succession Act 2006 (nsw) / Expedited Hearing of Leave Application Under S 19 and Substantive Application Under S 18
- Outcome
- Leave granted; application proceeded under s 18; revised statutory will authorised, signed and sealed by the Registrar; plaintiff's costs ordered out of the Child's estate on an indemnity basis; costs of the first and second defendants reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Wills' 'testamentary Capacity' 'minor Without Testamentary Capacity' 'superannuation Death Benefits' 'testamentary Trusts' "costs From Protected Person's Estate"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave and for an Order Authorising a Statutory Will Under the Succession Act 2006 (nsw) / Expedited Hearing of Leave Application Under S 19 and Substantive Application Under S 18
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the plaintiff under s 19 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) to apply for an order authorising a statutory will for the Child.' 'Whether the Child lacked testamentary capacity for the purposes of an order under s 18 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).' 'Whether the proposed new will was, or was reasonably likely to be, one that would have been made by the Child if the Child had testamentary capacity.' "What provision should be made for the Mother, Father and six siblings in the residue of the Child's estate." 'Whether the will should adjust residuary entitlements to take account of superannuation death benefits paid outside the estate.' 'Whether residuary bequests should be held on testamentary trusts.' "Whether the plaintiff's costs should be paid out of the Child's estate on an indemnity basis."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted leave and authorised a revised statutory will because the Child lacked testamentary capacity, the s 19 information had been provided, the s 22 requirements were satisfied, and it was reasonably likely that a person in the Child's position with testamentary capacity would make a new will accounting for the possible payment of superannuation death benefits outside the estate. The appropriate will was one that left the Mother 42.5% of residue, divided the balance equally between the Father and the six siblings, required adjustment so far as possible for superannuation death benefits paid to residuary beneficiaries, and held residuary shares on testamentary trusts.
Court Disposition
Leave granted; application proceeded under s 18; revised statutory will authorised, signed and sealed by the Registrar; plaintiff's costs ordered out of the Child's estate on an indemnity basis; costs of the first and second defendants reserved.
Orders
- ["Grant leave to the plaintiff to make an application on behalf of the Child for an order authorising a will to be made for the Child in terms set out in the annexure to Mr Buchanan's affidavit sworn 26 June 2017." 'Order that the application proceed forthwith as an application for an order under s 18 of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment