A1 Catering Services Pty Ltd v Manassen Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 530
The contractual indemnities in cl 13.1 of the loan agreement and cll 17.1–17.3 of the general security deed were not limited to reasonable legal costs and expressly covered costs on a solicitor and own client or full indemnity basis. Manassen's defence of A1 Catering's claim for return of the $300,000 Security was in connection with the preservation and exercise of rights under the Transaction Documents. No discretionary factor relied on by A1 Catering justified departing from Manassen's contractual entitlement, so A1 Catering was ordered to pay Manassen's costs on an indemnity basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs / On the Papers After Judgment Dated 27 February 2024
- Outcome
- Plaintiff to pay the second defendant's costs on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'contractual Costs Indemnity' 'security for Costs' 'loan Documents' 'exercise of Costs Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs / On the Papers After Judgment Dated 27 February 2024
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff should pay the second defendant's costs on the ordinary basis or on an indemnity basis." 'Whether the contractual costs clauses in the loan agreement and general security deed applied to costs incurred in defending the claim for return of the Security.' "Whether discretionary factors relied on by the plaintiff justified departing from the second defendant's contractual entitlement to indemnity costs."]
Ratio Decidendi
The contractual indemnities in cl 13.1 of the loan agreement and cll 17.1–17.3 of the general security deed were not limited to reasonable legal costs and expressly covered costs on a solicitor and own client or full indemnity basis. Manassen's defence of A1 Catering's claim for return of the $300,000 Security was in connection with the preservation and exercise of rights under the Transaction Documents. No discretionary factor relied on by A1 Catering justified departing from Manassen's contractual entitlement, so A1 Catering was ordered to pay Manassen's costs on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff to pay the second defendant's costs on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- ["The plaintiff is to pay the second defendant's costs of the proceedings on an indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment