AA v Board of the Australian Crime Commission [2010] FCA 553

AA v Board of the Australian Crime Commission [2010] FCA 553

The ACC Board resolutions were validly made under s 7J of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) and s 20 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth); the meeting and voting requirements were satisfied. Applicants’ claims of invalidity in the making of the 2007, 2008, and 2009 Determinations failed. The examination summonses and search warrants were validly issued. There was insufficient evidence that examiners failed to record their reasons as required, nor were the summonses invalid on that ground. Legal professional privilege over certain documents was valid when created, but had been waived by applicant’s conduct. All applications and claims for relief were dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Applications (and Related Cross Claims) / Final Hearing and Judgment
Outcome
Applications and cross-claims dismissed with costs; declarations and orders as specified.
Legal Topics
['validity of Administrative Decisions' 'judicial Review' 'legal Professional Privilege' 'waiver of Privilege' 'exercise of Statutory Powers' 'special Investigations and Operations' 'search Warrants']
['administrative Law' 'criminal Law' 'evidence'] ['validity of Administrative Decisions' 'judicial Review' 'legal Professional Privilege' 'waiver of Privilege' 'exercise of Statutory Powers' 'special Investigations and Operations' 'search Warrants']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Applications (and Related Cross Claims) / Final Hearing and Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether ACC Board resolutions in 2007, 2008, and 2009 authorising Operation Wolsley were valid' 'Whether the examination summonses and search warrants issued under the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) were valid' 'Whether examiners adequately recorded reasons as required by statute' 'Whether claim of legal professional privilege over seized documents could be maintained or had been waived']

Ratio Decidendi

The ACC Board resolutions were validly made under s 7J of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) and s 20 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth); the meeting and voting requirements were satisfied. Applicants’ claims of invalidity in the making of the 2007, 2008, and 2009 Determinations failed. The examination summonses and search warrants were validly issued. There was insufficient evidence that examiners failed to record their reasons as required, nor were the summonses invalid on that ground. Legal professional privilege over certain documents was valid when created, but had been waived by applicant’s conduct. All applications and claims for relief were dismissed.

Court Disposition

Applications and cross-claims dismissed with costs; declarations and orders as specified.

Orders

  • ['All applications are dismissed.' "Applicants to pay respondents' costs of and incidental to the applications." "In cross-claim NTD 10 of 2009, court declares privilege attached to specified documents at time of creation, but that privilege has been waived; cross-respondents to pay cross-claimant's costs."...