AAB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1375

AAB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1375

None of the proposed grounds of appeal had any arguable substance. The applicant failed to demonstrate any jurisdictional or appealable error. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed, as the grounds raised impermissible merits review and did not disclose jurisdictional error.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'credibility Findings' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether grounds of appeal disclose an arguable appealable error' "Whether there was jurisdictional error in Tribunal's decision" 'Whether applicant was denied procedural fairness' 'Whether time for appeal should be extended']

Ratio Decidendi

None of the proposed grounds of appeal had any arguable substance. The applicant failed to demonstrate any jurisdictional or appealable error. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed, as the grounds raised impermissible merits review and did not disclose jurisdictional error.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal dated 19 August 2016 be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed."]