AAB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1375
None of the proposed grounds of appeal had any arguable substance. The applicant failed to demonstrate any jurisdictional or appealable error. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed, as the grounds raised impermissible merits review and did not disclose jurisdictional error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'credibility Findings' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether grounds of appeal disclose an arguable appealable error' "Whether there was jurisdictional error in Tribunal's decision" 'Whether applicant was denied procedural fairness' 'Whether time for appeal should be extended']
Ratio Decidendi
None of the proposed grounds of appeal had any arguable substance. The applicant failed to demonstrate any jurisdictional or appealable error. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed, as the grounds raised impermissible merits review and did not disclose jurisdictional error.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal dated 19 August 2016 be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment