Corcoran v Far [2017] NSWCATCD 40
The applicant proved payment of a $1,160.00 rental bond and the respondent failed to prove, with supporting evidence such as invoices, quotations, rent ledger, condition reports or photographs, any entitlement to retain the bond. The applicant did not prove a fixed term tenancy, an entitlement to exclusive use of the upstairs bathroom, breach of quiet enjoyment, deliberate interference with internet services, actionable property loss, or compensable non-economic loss. Although the respondent had not served a valid termination notice and no termination order had been made, the Tribunal declined to award compensation because the respondent acted reasonably and in good faith in response to...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancy Application by Sub Tenant Against Head Tenant for Rental Bond Refund and Compensation Under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 NSW / Remitted Hearing After Appeal Panel Allowed the Appeal; Principal Judgment After Formal Hearing
- Outcome
- The applicant succeeded only on the rental bond refund claim; all compensation claims were dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['shared Household Tenancy' 'sub Tenant and Head Tenant Dispute' 'rental Bond Refund' 'tribunal Monetary Jurisdiction' 'quiet Enjoyment' 'wrongful Eviction' 'non Economic Loss' 'reduction of Services and Facilities']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy Application by Sub Tenant Against Head Tenant for Rental Bond Refund and Compensation Under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 NSW / Remitted Hearing After Appeal Panel Allowed the Appeal; Principal Judgment After Formal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the tenancy was for a fixed term of four months ending on 23 July 2016' "Whether the tenancy included the facility of the upstairs bathroom for the applicant's own personal use" "Whether the respondent breached the residential tenancy agreement by disturbing the applicant's quiet enjoyment or interfering with his peace, comfort and privacy" 'Whether the applicant was responsible for serious damage to the premises during the tenancy' "Whether the circumstances of the applicant's departure on or about 30 May 2016 amounted to wrongful eviction by the respondent" 'Whether the respondent established an entitlement to retain the rental bond amount of $1,160.00 or any part of it' 'Whether the applicant established claims for economic or non-economic compensation for breach of quiet enjoyment, reduction or withdrawal of facility, or wrongful eviction' 'Whether cl 23 of the Residential Tenancies Regulation 2010 NSW permitted an order above $15,000.00 where the proceeding included a rental bond claim']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant proved payment of a $1,160.00 rental bond and the respondent failed to prove, with supporting evidence such as invoices, quotations, rent ledger, condition reports or photographs, any entitlement to retain the bond. The applicant did not prove a fixed term tenancy, an entitlement to exclusive use of the upstairs bathroom, breach of quiet enjoyment, deliberate interference with internet services, actionable property loss, or compensable non-economic loss. Although the respondent had not served a valid termination notice and no termination order had been made, the Tribunal declined to award compensation because the respondent acted reasonably and in good faith in response to...
Court Disposition
The applicant succeeded only on the rental bond refund claim; all compensation claims were dismissed.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 175 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 NSW, within fourteen days of the date of this order, the respondent is to pay to the applicant the sum of $1,160.00, being the rental bond amount paid by the applicant to the respondent on or about 24 March 2016.' "The applicant's claim for compensation under...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment