Sullivan v R [2016] NSWCCA 172

Sullivan v R [2016] NSWCCA 172

No material error on the part of the sentencing judge was demonstrated in her application of the discount for guilty plea, assessment of the applicant's mental state in evaluating the objective gravity of the offences, or her approach to specific deterrence; leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Aaron John Sullivan; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal is granted; the appeal is dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sentence Appeal, Robbery With Offensive Weapon, Discount for Guilty Plea, Mental Illness and Sentencing, Deterrence in Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aaron John Sullivan

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in discount for guilty plea
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge failed to take proper account of the applicant’s mental state in assessing objective gravity
  3. 3 Whether undue weight was given to specific deterrence in light of the applicant’s mental illness

Ratio Decidendi

No material error on the part of the sentencing judge was demonstrated in her application of the discount for guilty plea, assessment of the applicant's mental state in evaluating the objective gravity of the offences, or her approach to specific deterrence; leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is granted; the appeal is dismissed.

Orders

  • Grant the applicant leave to appeal.
  • Dismiss the appeal.