AAV Australia Pty Limited v Regency Media Pty Limited (No. 2) [2008] NSWDC 115
The plaintiff is entitled to costs on the ordinary basis up to 5 September 2007 and on an indemnity basis thereafter because the offer of compromise represented a real and genuine compromise, and the defendant failed to show exceptional circumstances to depart from the Rules.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: AAV Australia Pty Limited; Defendant: Regency Media Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Costs Application
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for indemnity costs post-offer granted
- Legal Topics
- Offer of Compromise, Costs, Pre Judgment Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AAV Australia Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Regency Media Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to indemnity costs following rejection of an offer of compromise and result more favourable than the offer
- 2 Whether there are exceptional circumstances to depart from the ordinary rule regarding costs after an offer of compromise
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is entitled to costs on the ordinary basis up to 5 September 2007 and on an indemnity basis thereafter because the offer of compromise represented a real and genuine compromise, and the defendant failed to show exceptional circumstances to depart from the Rules.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for indemnity costs post-offer granted
Orders
- Order the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, such costs to be agreed or assessed on the ordinary basis up to and including 5 September 2007 and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment