AB v R [2014] NSWCCA 339
The sentencing judge's finding regarding intention to torture was open on the evidence; objective seriousness assessment was justified; no error in declining a discount for guilty plea where protection of the public required; no legitimate sense of grievance arose regarding parity with co-offender's sentence; appeal must fail as no error was demonstrated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'sentencing Principles' 'parity' 'discount for Guilty Plea' 'objective Seriousness of Murder']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding that the applicant intended to torture the deceased' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in the assessment of the seriousness of the offence of murder' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in giving no discount for the utilitarian plea of guilty in respect of murder' 'Whether the applicant has a legitimate grievance arising from the sentence imposed compared to a co-offender']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge's finding regarding intention to torture was open on the evidence; objective seriousness assessment was justified; no error in declining a discount for guilty plea where protection of the public required; no legitimate sense of grievance arose regarding parity with co-offender's sentence; appeal must fail as no error was demonstrated.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment