REGINA v AB [2001] NSWCCA 496
The Court held that the notice given for tendency evidence complied in substance with the Evidence Regulations by referencing previously served documents; tendency evidence was admissible given its high probative value; the directions to the jury regarding tendency evidence were appropriate; and the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive nor contrary to sentencing principles.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence is granted. Both conviction appeal and sentence appeal are dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'tendency Evidence' 'requirement to Give Notice' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'sentencing Principles']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether tendency evidence was properly admitted given the notice requirements under Evidence Act 1995 and Evidence Regulations 1995' "Whether the trial judge's sentencing complied with established sentencing principles" "Whether the trial judge's directions regarding tendency evidence were correct"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the notice given for tendency evidence complied in substance with the Evidence Regulations by referencing previously served documents; tendency evidence was admissible given its high probative value; the directions to the jury regarding tendency evidence were appropriate; and the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive nor contrary to sentencing principles.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence is granted. Both conviction appeal and sentence appeal are dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence is granted' 'Conviction appeal is dismissed' 'Sentence appeal is dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment