Abbott -V- Proprietors Strata Plan 46094 [1999] NSWLEC 140
Although the respondent satisfied the applicant's claim by removing the offending structure after proceedings commenced, the removal was causally attributed to respondent's willingness to abide by Council authority rather than the proceedings themselves; thus, the discretion under Pt 15 r 7 should not be exercised in favour of the applicant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceeding / Application for Costs Following Cessation of Subject Matter
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'discretion in Costs Orders' 'planning Approvals' 'enforcement of Planning Laws']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceeding / Application for Costs Following Cessation of Subject Matter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant is entitled to costs where subject matter of claim has ceased to exist' 'Whether discretion to award costs should be exercised under Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 15 r 7 and Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the respondent satisfied the applicant's claim by removing the offending structure after proceedings commenced, the removal was causally attributed to respondent's willingness to abide by Council authority rather than the proceedings themselves; thus, the discretion under Pt 15 r 7 should not be exercised in favour of the applicant.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; no order as to costs
Orders
- ['Application by consent dismissed' 'No order as to costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment