Javam v Islam [2020] NSWCATAP 72

Javam v Islam [2020] NSWCATAP 72

The Tribunal correctly found that the amount claimed or in dispute in both proceedings was more than $30,000, making r 38(2)(b) applicable and allowing costs to follow the event. The Owner was the successful party in both proceedings. No error was demonstrated in the Tribunal's discretionary decision regarding costs, and the Tribunal adhered to the guiding principle of just, quick and cheap resolution.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision of Appeal Panel
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['costs' 'appeals' 'discretionary Decisions' 'principle That Costs Follow the Event']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Decision of Appeal Panel

  1. 1 ["Whether the Tribunal erred in finding that the amount claimed or in dispute in the Owner's proceedings was more than $30,000 under r 38(2)(b) of the NCAT Rules" 'Whether the Tribunal erred in finding that the Owner was the successful party in both proceedings and in not making a separate costs order for the overpayment claim' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to adhere to the guiding principle in s 36 of the NCAT Act']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal correctly found that the amount claimed or in dispute in both proceedings was more than $30,000, making r 38(2)(b) applicable and allowing costs to follow the event. The Owner was the successful party in both proceedings. No error was demonstrated in the Tribunal's discretionary decision regarding costs, and the Tribunal adhered to the guiding principle of just, quick and cheap resolution.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.']