Waheed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FCA 48
Adjournment refused due to lack of credible evidence and inconsistencies regarding applicant's presence in Australia; substantive application dismissed for failure of the applicant to attend the hearing.
- Parties
- Applicant: Abdullah Waheed; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal and Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Determination on Adjournment and Dismissal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Dismissal for Non Appearance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdullah Waheed
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal and Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Determination on Adjournment and Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an adjournment ought be granted where authenticity of evidence challenged
- 2 Whether substantive application should be dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
Adjournment refused due to lack of credible evidence and inconsistencies regarding applicant's presence in Australia; substantive application dismissed for failure of the applicant to attend the hearing.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The name of the first respondent be amended to "Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs".
- The application filed on 11 April 2024 be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment