Hamad, Abdullahi Mustaf v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1395

The Tribunal erred by requiring evidence of systematic conduct as a prerequisite for finding persecution under the Refugee Convention, contrary to established legal principles.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 04 November 1998
Procedural Posture: Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome: Decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal set aside and remitted for reconsideration; costs awarded to applicant.
Legal Topics: ['protection Visa' 'definition of Refugee' 'persecution Under the Refugee Convention']

['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'definition of Refugee' 'persecution Under the Refugee Convention']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in law by requiring acts of persecution to amount to a 'course of systematic conduct'" 'Interpretation of persecution under the Refugee Convention']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal erred by requiring evidence of systematic conduct as a prerequisite for finding persecution under the Refugee Convention, contrary to established legal principles.

Court Disposition

Decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal set aside and remitted for reconsideration; costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

['The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal is set aside.' 'The matter is remitted to the Refugee Review Tribunal for further consideration according to law.' "The respondent pay the applicant's costs."]