Abignano Nominees Pty Ltd v Sheripeter Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1378
The only capital contributions proved were the payments made for the purchase of the property; later unequal payments of development expenses were advances made for the partnership and attracted simple interest at seven per cent per annum. The Partition Agreement was not intended to be a complete and final record of the parties' arrangements about equality of distribution, and the oral agreement to reassess unit values on final accounting was not inconsistent with it, so the distributed units must be valued at market value as at 17 September 2012. Sheripeter's GST refund arose from the tax consequences of its creditable acquisition of commercial units and did not affect equality of...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Partnership Dispute for Taking of Account / Principal Judgment Determining Disputed Accounting Issues Before Reference to a Referee
- Outcome
- Plaintiff directed to bring in short minutes of order in accordance with the reasons; proceedings to be referred to a referee for taking the account.
- Legal Topics
- ['taking of Partnership Account' 'interest on Advances' 'capital Contributions' 'partition Agreement' 'in Specie Distribution of Partnership Assets' 'gst and Input Tax Credits' 'construction Margin' 'partnership Dissolution']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Partnership Dispute for Taking of Account / Principal Judgment Determining Disputed Accounting Issues Before Reference to a Referee
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether payments made by partners during the development, apart from purchase price contributions, were capital contributions or advances attracting interest.' 'Whether values assigned to units in the Partition Agreement were final for the partnership accounting or whether the units distributed in specie should be valued at market value as at 17 September 2012.' 'Whether the account should recognise any adjustment because Sheripeter received a GST refund or input tax credit in respect of commercial units transferred to it.' 'Whether the account should recognise a liability to Logic Design and Build Pty Ltd, or a credit to Sheripeter, for a margin on construction costs.' 'Whether orders should be made for the taking of an account following dissolution of the partnership.']
Ratio Decidendi
The only capital contributions proved were the payments made for the purchase of the property; later unequal payments of development expenses were advances made for the partnership and attracted simple interest at seven per cent per annum. The Partition Agreement was not intended to be a complete and final record of the parties' arrangements about equality of distribution, and the oral agreement to reassess unit values on final accounting was not inconsistent with it, so the distributed units must be valued at market value as at 17 September 2012. Sheripeter's GST refund arose from the tax consequences of its creditable acquisition of commercial units and did not affect equality of...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff directed to bring in short minutes of order in accordance with the reasons; proceedings to be referred to a referee for taking the account.
Orders
- ['The parties are entitled to simple interest of seven per cent per annum on advances made by them or by other parties on their direction, and expenses incurred in connection with building works, marketing, sales and associated matters are to be treated as advances and not capital contributions.' 'On the final...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment