Regina v Sen [1999] NSWCCA 199
The sentencing judge relied on materially incorrect information that the speed limit was 60 kilometres per hour when it was in fact 80 kilometres per hour; although the error was not the judge's, it affected the factual basis of sentence and invoked the Court's jurisdiction. Having regard to the seriousness of the two aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death offences, the applicant's 0.219 per cent blood alcohol concentration, running a red traffic signal, two deaths, the post-Jurisic upward trend, and mitigating factors including early guilty pleas, remorse and limited prior record, the original nine-year concurrent sentences were quashed and replaced with concurrent total terms of...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence Imposed for Two Counts of Aggravated Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death. / Court of Criminal Appeal; Application for Leave Granted, Appeal Allowed, Sentences Quashed and Applicant Resentenced.
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; application for leave to appeal against sentence granted; sentences imposed in the District Court quashed; applicant resentenced.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death' 'severity Appeal' 'sentencing Error Based on Incorrect Factual Material' 'alcohol Related Driving Offences' 'guideline Judgment' 'totality' 'minimum and Additional Terms']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence Imposed for Two Counts of Aggravated Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death. / Court of Criminal Appeal; Application for Leave Granted, Appeal Allowed, Sentences Quashed and Applicant Resentenced.
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether incorrect information given to the sentencing judge about the applicable speed limit caused error in the factual material relied on for sentence.' 'What sentence should be imposed for two counts of aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death involving a blood alcohol concentration of 0.219 per cent, a red traffic signal and two deaths.' 'Whether there were special circumstances justifying departure from the formula mentioned in s5 (2) of the Sentencing Act.' 'Whether the concurrent totality approach taken by the sentencing judge should be disturbed for the multiple offences.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge relied on materially incorrect information that the speed limit was 60 kilometres per hour when it was in fact 80 kilometres per hour; although the error was not the judge's, it affected the factual basis of sentence and invoked the Court's jurisdiction. Having regard to the seriousness of the two aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death offences, the applicant's 0.219 per cent blood alcohol concentration, running a red traffic signal, two deaths, the post-Jurisic upward trend, and mitigating factors including early guilty pleas, remorse and limited prior record, the original nine-year concurrent sentences were quashed and replaced with concurrent total terms of...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; application for leave to appeal against sentence granted; sentences imposed in the District Court quashed; applicant resentenced.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal against sentence is granted.' 'The appeal is allowed.' 'The sentences imposed in the District Court are quashed.' 'In lieu thereof, on each charge the applicant is sentenced to total terms of seven years imprisonment to be served concurrently.' 'The sentences are divided into...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment