Aboriginal Develop Commisson v Ralkon Agricultual Co Pty Ltd [1982] FCA 269
The grounds raised by the appellant did not constitute a basis for interfering with the exercise of the judge's discretion regarding extension of time; it was not clear that the application must fail or that any orders would necessarily be futile. Furthermore, there was no undue delay justifying interference with the judge's decision.
- Parties
- Appellant: Aboriginal Development Commission; Respondent: Ralkon Agricultural Company Pty. Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Competency of Application, Procedural Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aboriginal Development Commission
Appellant
Ralkon Agricultural Company Pty. Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should interfere with the exercise of discretion to extend time for an application under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
- 2 Whether the application for review was futile
- 3 Whether there was undue delay in making the application
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds raised by the appellant did not constitute a basis for interfering with the exercise of the judge's discretion regarding extension of time; it was not clear that the application must fail or that any orders would necessarily be futile. Furthermore, there was no undue delay justifying interference with the judge's decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment