Aboriginal Housing Office v Cargill [2019] NSWCATCD 45
Although the tenant's Turner's syndrome was accepted as a disability, the Tribunal was not satisfied that termination of the tenancy was likely to result in undue hardship. The effects relied on by the tenant, including impact on possible intensive correction order, connection to the house and area, attachment to animals, and access to local supports, were not so severe or excessive as to meet the statutory threshold. Because s 154D(3) was not made out, termination was mandatory and no consideration of s 154E factors was required.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancy Termination Application Under S 91(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 / Reasons for Decision and Amended Orders Under Section 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
- Outcome
- Tenancy terminated immediately; order of possession suspended until 1 July 2019.
- Legal Topics
- ['termination for Illegal Use of Premises' 'mandatory Termination' 'undue Hardship' 'disability' 'criminal Offence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy Termination Application Under S 91(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 / Reasons for Decision and Amended Orders Under Section 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the tenant caused or permitted illegal use of the premises under s 91(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010.' 'Whether termination of the tenancy was mandated by s 154D(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010.' 'Whether s 154D(3)(b) applied because the tenant was a person with a disability within the meaning of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 NSW and termination would be likely to result in undue hardship.' 'Whether, if termination was discretionary, the s 154E factors should be considered.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the tenant's Turner's syndrome was accepted as a disability, the Tribunal was not satisfied that termination of the tenancy was likely to result in undue hardship. The effects relied on by the tenant, including impact on possible intensive correction order, connection to the house and area, attachment to animals, and access to local supports, were not so severe or excessive as to meet the statutory threshold. Because s 154D(3) was not made out, termination was mandatory and no consideration of s 154E factors was required.
Court Disposition
Tenancy terminated immediately; order of possession suspended until 1 July 2019.
Orders
- ['The tenancy is terminated immediately.' 'The order of possession is suspended until 1 July 2019.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment