ACB17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 237
There is no prospect of success in the appeal, as the Tribunal and Federal Circuit Court both adequately considered and addressed the issues raised. The appellant's explanation for non-appearance and adjournment was insufficient. The appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution and costs awarded against the appellant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal, After Failure of Appellant to Appear
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; costs ordered against appellant.
- Legal Topics
- ['application for Extension of Time' 'dismissal for Want of Prosecution' 'judicial Review of Tribunal Decision' 'protection Visa Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal, After Failure of Appellant to Appear
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution' 'Whether grounds of appeal have merit' "Whether adjournment should be granted in absence of appellant's appearance"]
Ratio Decidendi
There is no prospect of success in the appeal, as the Tribunal and Federal Circuit Court both adequately considered and addressed the issues raised. The appellant's explanation for non-appearance and adjournment was insufficient. The appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution and costs awarded against the appellant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; costs ordered against appellant.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent, of and incidental to the appeal, to be taxed if not agreed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment